How Personal Risk Deeply Reflects God’s Nature

© Scott E. Shaum 2014

IMG_7978

Was it worth it?

In 2005 I had been in remote Cambodia providing some much needed pastoral care and counsel to a multi-national church planting team. The small city where they were working clung to the banks of the Mekong River not too far from the Viet Nam border.  While there, I contracted Hemorrhagic Dengue Fever, which is a mosquito born virus similar to malaria. It took me 14 months to fully regain my strength.

Two years later I was back in Cambodia. On the way home I began to manifest some strong flu-like symptoms. Within 5 days of being home I was in the hospital. In the ER I had some sort of episode that was similar to cardiac arrest, but that is not what happened. It would take a year of tests and medical specialists and finally Mayo Clinic before I had any kind of “answers”. There I learned what likely happened is that I had contracted some unknown Asian virus that had “made the leap” into my nervous system. This virus, following so soon after Dengue, compromised my auto-immune system. I now manifest symptoms that land me within the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome spectrum. I will likely live with this for the rest of my life. God has not healed me despite many prayers and various traditional and non-traditional attempts.

Is it unwise to take such risks? Is it foolish for medical workers to travel to West Africa to provide needed care in the Ebola crisis? Is it too risky to go against the US State Department warnings and locate oneself along the Turkey/Syria/Iraq border to care for the flood of traumatized refugees while ISIS bears down? Is it too high a cost to step into relational messiness in an attempt to facilitate reconciliation?  It is true each of these are costly and risky. But cost and risk is not to be our prime concern. If it is, we will be more concerned with our own well-being than that of others. And that self-concern is most unlike our God.

When we take risks that place us in possible harm’s way for the benefits of others, we are mimicking one of the core characteristics of God’s nature. You see, our God is Father. He desires sons and daughters to pour his life and love into. So much so that he has sought us out at great personal cost. The Son of God on the cross is the greatest display of God’s character, because it shows the self-sacrificing, self-giving nature of his love. And he desires other sons and daughters who will mimic him. That is how the glory of God’s love is displayed – He pours into us at personal cost and we are given the privileged opportunity to draw others into this relationship too. And sometimes that comes at great personal cost.  Yes, we must seek counsel and be prudent in our choices. But the priority question is not ‘ought I risk’. The question is, ‘what opportunities has God placed before me to carry his love to those who need it the greatest’. To live in a self-giving, self-sacrificing manner for others’ benefit is to be most like our Father in heaven. Sure there may be fear and turmoil. That is normative. Even Jesus experienced this in the hours before the cross (see John 12:27-33  and Mark 14:32-36). Each act of risk for another is a deliberate act of love.

I know that I did not fully grasp all these truths during those early visits to Cambodia. The Father was simply guiding me in truths I did not yet understand. Now that I do grasp these realities better, they make for challenging choices. The willingness to risk for others well being is the courageous work of shepherding – to lay one’s life down for the sheep.

And, yes, it was and is worth it.

Posted in Shepherding Well, Thinking Well | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Addressing a Huge Gap and the Primary Reason for Pastoral Care

© Scott E. Shaum 2014

IMG_6840 - Version 2

 

Michael Reeves Delighting in the Trinity is one of those if-you-have-a-pulse-you-gotta-read-this-book reads. It is the most significant book I have read in the past 5 years or so. Reeves is a British historical theologian which may sound like the stuff of boredom and you will be pleasantly surprised. Reeves writes of deep and neglected truths in an endearing, engaging, witty manner. I have read and reread portions of this book so many times I have lost count. It costs a pittance for your Kindle. Buy it. Ingest it. It is essential reading for your walk with God and for how you care for others. This is not a book about pastoral ministry. But its ramifications are profound on the work of shepherds. Why? Let me throw this out which I will build upon in other entries:

We do not shepherd others for effectiveness nor productivity nor for maturation nor personal well-being. These are all corollary dynamics that are desirable for sure. However, we shepherd for one primary reason, one alone. That purpose is to facilitate the Spirit’s work in the other’s life to be aware and attentive and responsive to the constant invitation to join the eternal communion that is the Father and the Son. Period. It is all about relationship – God with us and our response to God in turn. If we care for others for any other primary objective – no matter how good or biblical, then we miss a crucial element of the shepherding work.

Be encouraged to obtain this book and allow it to address your own walk with the Father and the Son. Shepherding ramifications will follow. And if you have or do read it, please comment on it.

Posted in Resources, Thinking Well | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Joining in on the Good Shepherd’s Work

“I am the Good Shepherd.”

IMG_0577_2

Jesus is the Shepherd. We do not ever replace him.  He kept Peter in reigns when he commissioned him to “tend my sheep” (John 21: ).  These sheep are his sheep.  They are never “my staff” nor “my team” nor “my flock.” They are his, purchased with his blood (Acts 20:28; 1 Peter 1:18-19; Revelation 5:9-10).  Our insistence on this point is not being legalistic, but rather its being specific. Being particular with our verbiage is wise, for it protects.

First, it protects the sheep from possessive and heavy-handed leaders and other influencers (like shepherds).  Second, it protects the leader from the unhealthy tendencies that seep from the open wound of possessiveness.  Further, we are reminded who we primarily serve.  We do not take over Jesus’ work, we continue it in utter dependence on him. Jesus’ work was to love his Father by doing whatever his Father told him (John 5:19-20, 30; 14:31).  We are to continue this work. This has profound implications in the everyday practice of our work. For we are not to respond to needs around us, we are to love G0d and do whatever he tells us (John 14-16). How do you experience the Father’s personal love for you – no, I mean really experience it? How does that reality direct your daily decisions? This is not mere spiritualistic chatter. This is the ultimate reality. We will wrestle with a Trinitarian model of this shepherding work often.

This blog will seek to present practical tools, solid thinking, wise self-care and development practices all based on an applied theology of shepherding that is Trinitarian, Christo-centric, Word-based and contextualized for the unique work of the international shepherding of cross-cultural workers.  That’s a mouth full. Tune in regularly.

Posted in Shepherding Well, Thinking Well | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments